Are stratification and broad statements outside the evaluator's knowledge allowed in evaluations?

In evaluations, stratification and broad statements that fall outside the evaluator's knowledge are prohibited because they can undermine the integrity and accuracy of the evaluation process. Evaluators are expected to rely on specific, accurate data and evidence to support their assessments. Allowing unverified generalizations or unfounded claims could lead to misleading conclusions, which can adversely affect decision-making, planning, and resource allocation.

The prohibition ensures that evaluations are based on objective information and empirical evidence rather than assumptions or vague assertions. This emphasizes the importance of rigorous standards in the evaluation process, promoting transparency and accountability. By maintaining a focus on verifiable and relevant information, the evaluation process becomes more credible, ultimately benefiting the entities or individuals being assessed.