What should be avoided in evaluations to ensure objectivity?

In evaluations, it is crucial to avoid personal biases to ensure objectivity. Personal biases can cloud judgment and lead to unfair assessments, ultimately skewing the results. When evaluators allow their subjective opinions or preferences to influence their evaluations, they risk misrepresenting the true performance or potential of the individuals being assessed.

An objective evaluation is one that relies on measurable criteria and standardized practices, which help to create a fair and consistent environment for all participants. This objectivity is essential in maintaining trust in the evaluation process, as it assures stakeholders that assessments are based on facts and evidence rather than personal feelings or relationships.

The other options—formal language, exact metrics, and standardized formats—are not inherently problematic for maintaining objectivity. In fact, exact metrics and standardized formats can enhance objectivity by providing clear criteria for evaluation. Formal language may contribute to professionalism, but it does not impact the objectivity of the evaluation in the same way that personal biases do.